Thoughts for All Saints

Commentary by Jim Bordwine, ThD

Volume 3 Number 1

February 13, 2014

Conjunction Malfunction

 God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him;

male and female He created them.

(Genesis 1:27)

Is it possible that we have misinterpreted one of the most significant Biblical declarations concerning the nature of humanity? I’m referring to the verse quoted above, Genesis 1:27, in which we are told that God created human beings “male and female.” Traditionally, we have interpreted this short phrase in which the conjunction “and” connects the words “male” and “female” as teaching that God created two genders of human beings. Some human beings are male and other human beings are female. We have assumed that Moses meant that God created a male gender and a female gender, separate and distinct from one another.

This assumption, however, is certainly no longer the norm in our culture. A different idea has become prevalent, namely, that an individual human being may consider themselves male or female or some combination of both, if they choose. Therefore, what Moses was really saying is that God created human beings with no distinct male or female gender identity, but so designed human beings that we are capable of being either male or female, or a combination of both, depending on how we feel about ourselves.

This is absolute foolishness, of course, to anyone who believes the Scriptures. In fact, it should be a ridiculous notion to anyone, Bible believer or not, who takes seriously the history of our race. In our contemporary culture, however, those who see themselves as “progressive” and, therefore, unrestrained by traditional definitions and social morays, are celebrating the enlightenment that is finally becoming mainstream. This step forward in our collective self-awareness has now been acknowledged and incorporated into the operations of the world’s most popular social media platform known as Facebook.

Today Facebook announced “a custom gender option,” which will allow users to select the pronoun by which they would like to be referred to publicly. Those who wish to be identified as males may choose “he/his”; those who wish to be identified as females may choose “she/her”; and those who wish to maintain neutrality may choose “they/their.” Moreover, users may select from a number of options to identify their sexuality, including: “androgynous,” “transgender,” and “gender fluid.” Ironically, in what is supposed to be, I assume, a liberating opportunity for self-expression and an historic step forward for social consciousness, Facebook will also allow users to control who sees these custom gender specifications.

As one who believes the Bible is the very Word of God and is, therefore, always binding and relevant, regardless of the passage of time, I see these kinds of developments in our society as nothing less than brazen expressions of rebellion against God and His authority. We cannot expect to prosper or even remain stable as a nation as such trends toward autonomy continue.

Advertisements